bug#12518: closed (outline-minor-mode doesn't work well in C(++) mode)

[GNU bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:55:21 -0500
with message-id <jwvfrz2eejw.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#12518: outline-minor-mode doesn't work well in C(++) 
mode
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #12518,
regarding outline-minor-mode doesn't work well in C(++) mode
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs@gnu.org.)


-- 
12518: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12518
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> outline-minor-mode doesn't work well in C(++) mode
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:08:18 -0400
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> As the subject says.
> It's not getting enough love,
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#12518: outline-minor-mode doesn't work well in C(++) mode
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Fri, 12 Jan 2024 10:55:21 -0500
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
>
>
>
>
> > That was 12 years ago, and it has gotten a little bit of attention at
> > least in the time since.  Could you summarize some of the current issues
> > with `outline-minor-mode'?
>
> I stopped trying to use Outline minor mode in C and can't remember what
> were the main annoyances.  Obviously my bug report was ...hmmm... really
> poor, so it's not worth keeping.
>
> IIRC I think one of the main things I wanted was to be able to fold "a
> function" so we'd keep a single line for that function, whereas
> currently a function like:
>
>     static void
>     myfun (blabla
>            blabla)
>     {
>       bla blabla;
>     }
>
> is treated as 3 independent "headings".
>
>
>         Stefan
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---