[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: font-lock-comment-face
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: font-lock-comment-face |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 10:59:17 +0200 |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 17:46:31 +0900 (JST)
>
> > I think comments are using reddish colors for such a long time that we
> > shouldn't change their default color in any radical way.
>
> This is only true if a significant number of people actually like the
> current default (among those who use a dark-background)
We could take a poll, if that's important.
> I doubt anyone
> actually *depends* on the precise color used, only that it stand out
> from the surrounding text.
Nevertheless, if someone is used to see comments in red, they will be
confused, at least initially, and perhaps annoyed, to see them in a
very different color.
> The problem with red is that if it gets dark, you can't read it, and if
> it gets too bright and saturated, it drives you insane.
Does FireBrick look so badly on dark background? IIRC, it's not a
saturated color, and neither is it too dark, is it? Perhaps we could
use it in both background modes?
- font-lock-comment-face, Miles Bader, 2000/10/13
- Re: font-lock-comment-face, Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/13
- Re: font-lock-comment-face, Miles Bader, 2000/10/13
- Re: font-lock-comment-face,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: font-lock-comment-face, Miles Bader, 2000/10/13
- Re: font-lock-comment-face, Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/13
- Re: font-lock-comment-face, Miles Bader, 2000/10/13
- Re: font-lock-comment-face, Eli Zaretskii, 2000/10/13
- Re: font-lock-comment-face, Miles Bader, 2000/10/13