[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unimportant question: CL versus Scheme
|
From: |
Gerd Moellmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: unimportant question: CL versus Scheme |
|
Date: |
14 May 2001 11:39:36 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.104 |
address@hidden (Kai Großjohann) writes:
> Idly wondering what's the maintainers' opinion about CL versus
> Scheme... Should Emacs move towards one of the two languages as
> extension language, and if so, which one?
My personal opinion is that it would be a mistake to try to replace
ELisp with a different language; there's just too much ELisp out
there which breaks even with small changes of semantics.