[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicode support
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Unicode support |
Date: |
25 Jul 2001 17:55:52 +0900 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> Changing shape after each typed character will probably have
> undesirable effects on many optimizations used by the Emacs redisplay
> engine, specifically those for inserting a single character. That's
> why I suggested to go about it as we do with just-in-time font-lock,
> i.e. defer them a bit.
I think it's much more important that the users get what they expect --
if people that type in arabic find constantly mutating characters the
most natural way for things to work, then I think saving a few cycles is
not worth it (the direct-insert optimizations are worth less and less in
general these days anyway, with machines getting faster and faster).
Of course they might _like_ `deferred resolution', ...
-Miles
--
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come. --Nietzsche
- Re: Unicode support, (continued)
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/19
- Re: Unicode support, Dave Love, 2001/07/23
- Re: Unicode support, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/25
- Re: Unicode support, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/07/24
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/25
- Re: Unicode support,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Unicode support, Roozbeh Pournader, 2001/07/25
- Re: Unicode support, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/07/25
Re: Unicode support, Dave Love, 2001/07/22
Re: Unicode support, Karl Eichwalder, 2001/07/19
Re: Unicode support (was: null-device), Dave Love, 2001/07/22