[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice? |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Oct 2001 13:54:04 +0200 (IST) |
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Pavel =?iso-8859-2?q?Jan=EDk?= wrote:
> > > I delete it? We have it in CVS so I see no problem in it. This applies
> to
> > > almost every code we have in #if 0...
> >
> > Some of the #if 0'ed functions give a doc string because it's too long
> > for some preprocessors.
>
> yes, I take care of this while converting into new style of doc-strings
> (and I am in fact removing such occurrences automatically). I double check
> my effort by ediffing new and old DOC files. But this is not an issue
> here. This function is not and DEFUN:
>
> #if 0
> /* Changed this DEFUN to a DEAFUN, so as not to confuse `make-docfile'. */
> DEAFUN ("expand-file-name", Fexpand_file_name, Sexpand_file_name, 1, 2, 0,
> "Convert FILENAME to absolute, and canonicalize it.\n\
In the case of expand-file-name, IIRC it's the old version of the code,
it's there since v20.1 or something ("cvs annotate" should tell). I
replied to the ``almost every other code we have'' part in your message.
- expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Miles Bader, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/22
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/22
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/24
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/25
Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/22