[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice? |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Oct 2001 16:06:30 +0200 (IST) |
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Pavel =?iso-8859-2?q?Jan=EDk?= wrote:
> > In the case of expand-file-name, IIRC it's the old version of the code,
> > it's there since v20.1 or something ("cvs annotate" should tell). I
>
> OK, so in this case: can I remove that code? It is not used, it is in CVS
> so we can not lose it. It only takes space in the sources. I'd like to know
> your opinion on this.
>
> What is the reason to have old versions both in CVS and in the current,
> latest sources?
I don't remember; perhaps Richard does.
FWIW, I think it's okay to remove that now.
- expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Miles Bader, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Pavel Janík, 2001/10/21
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/22
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/22
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/24
- Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/25
Re: expand-file-name in fileio.c twice?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/22