[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lexical mumblings
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: lexical mumblings |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Oct 2001 22:15:18 -0700 (MST) |
There are several possible ways -- for instance, a special `llet' form,
if you just want to use lexical binding for particular cases [maybe in a
speed critical inner loop],
I see no harm in that. If you yearn to do it, please write the code.
I want to take a look at it before it is installed, though.
or perhaps putting `(use-lexical-binding)'
at the top-level of an elisp source file, which would cause
byte-compiler to lexically bind local variables instead of using the
normal dynamic binding.
I think that binding a variable in the -*- line would be a cleaner and
more consistent interface for this.
You do plan to make this work interpreted too, right?
- Re: lexical mumblings, (continued)
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Andrew Innes, 2001/10/31
- Re: lexical mumblings, Sam Steingold, 2001/10/26
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/29
- Re: lexical mumblings, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/30
- Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/29
Re: lexical mumblings, Stefan Monnier, 2001/10/21
Re: lexical mumblings, Miles Bader, 2001/10/20