[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: idea -> internal frames?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: idea -> internal frames? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:56:22 -0700 (MST) |
> A minibuffer under the speedbar window would be too small to see much in.
> Anyway, adding another minibuffer here would be a big increase in
complexity,
> which I think we MUST avoid.
<snip>
Would it have a mode-line? header-line? fringe?
It would have everything an ordinary window has, and special only
regarding next-window, split-window and delete-window.
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, (continued)
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/28
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/29
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Kevin A. Burton, 2001/10/29
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Kevin A. Burton, 2001/10/30
- Re[2]: idea -> internal frames?, Eric M. Ludlam, 2001/10/29
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/10/30
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Kevin A. Burton, 2001/10/29
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/30
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Kevin A. Burton, 2001/10/30
- Re: idea -> internal frames?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re[2]: idea -> internal frames?, Eric M. Ludlam, 2001/10/24
- Re: Re[2]: idea -> internal frames?, Kevin A. Burton, 2001/10/24
- Re[4]: idea -> internal frames?, Eric M. Ludlam, 2001/10/24
- Re: idea -> internal frames?, Richard Stallman, 2001/10/28
Re: idea -> internal frames?, Kai Großjohann, 2001/10/24
Re: idea -> internal frames?, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/10/25