[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --program-suffix
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: --program-suffix |
Date: |
10 Nov 2001 19:24:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/21.1 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
|> Should I apply
|> these rules to lib-src/* utilities?
|>
|> No, because they are not installed in the user's PATH; they are
|> private command names, in effect. Some are run from Lisp code or from
|> makefiles. Not renaming them means we don't have the problem of
|> changing this Lisp code and the makefiles.
Some of them are installed in PATH, some in exec-directory. So I'd say
the first ones should be renamed, the latter not.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
address@hidden completely different."
SuSE Labs, SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/05
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/09
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/12
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/12
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/13
- Re: --program-suffix, Pavel Janík, 2001/11/13
- Re: --program-suffix, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/13
Please help developing Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/11