[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Nov 2001 23:11:33 -0700 (MST) |
To solve this, I suggested to change the values of two variables
which tune the operation of JIT stealth:
(setq jit-lock-stealth-time 16)
(setq jit-lock-stealth-nice 0.5)
(The default values are 3 and 0.125, respectively.)
Why increase jit-lock-stealth-time? I don't see a benefit for that.
As for jit-lock-stealth-nice, the reduction is probably a good idea on
machines that are lightly loaded, such as personal machines. It might
be a bad idea on machines that are typically more loaded.
Maybe the best thing is to use a formula based on the load average to
decide how long this should be. Maybe also estimate the total
speed of the computer--that should not be hard to do.
- JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/11
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/12
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/12
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/12
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/12
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/12
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/12
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/12
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Alan Shutko, 2001/11/12
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/13
- Re: JIT stealth font-lock tuning parameters, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/11/13