Re: --program-suffix

[Pavel Janík]

   From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
   Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:26:53 -0700 (MST)

   >     OK, I will leave it, but you did not answered my question: should this
   >     alternative name be GNUecams21-21.1.50 or GNUecams-21.1.50-21?
   > 
   > I think it should be the latter, because that is what results from
   > applying the specified transformation rules to the standard name
   > emacs-21.1.50.

Sorry for confusion, I made a mistake in the sentence you are quoting. The
question should be: Should this alternative name be GNUecams21-21.1.50 or
GNUecams-21.1.5021? The change is in the second name, because this fixed
one is the result of transformation. Do you agree with the second one even
now? I think it can confuse users.
-- 
Pavel Janík

Are you joking? Fast and lightweight HTTP server written in Perl?
                  -- Freshmeat just announced new package ;-)