Re: auto-save-file-name-transforms too simple?

[Kai Großjohann]

"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:

> Btw, since this explicitly targets remote files, I think it should run
> the result of expand-file-name through convert-standard-filename.  The
> latter is a no-op on Unix and GNU systems, but on Windows and DOS it
> replaces characters that the underlying filesystem disallows.  Remote
> file names are likely to suffer from this problem.

Well, I think the nonstandard filenames are more likely to sit in the
"\\2" part, and that's only known until much later.

So maybe the places that _use_ auto-save-file-name-transforms should
be changed, not the place that _sets_ it.

kai
-- 
Simplification good!  Oversimplification bad!  (Larry Wall)