[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 02:33:57 -0700 (MST) |
Actually I think that's one reason why the emacs C code [for reading
buffer names] uses the `Prompt: (default foo) ' style, because it's
easier to simply append '(default foo)' to an existing prompt than it is
to parse the prompt and put the `(default foo)' in the "right place".
Yes, that was the reason. I remember it now.
I think format 2 looks nicer. But if we want to use that format
generally, we have to find a way to implement it in the functions that
add a default to a user-supplied prompt. This way needs to be clean,
reliable, and upward-compatible. We can't change all the calls
to those minibuffer functions.
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/25
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/28
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/28
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/28
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/29
- Re: table.el, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2001/11/26