[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 04:19:53 -0700 (MST) |
> I agree that a change to read-from-minibuffer might introduce
problems.
> That wouldn't bother me, but I won't try to push for it.
> Instead, we could simply provide a new function which provides the
> "standard" behavior and tell people that they should use that one
> instead of read-from-minibuffer.
> This will tend to cause unnecessary user-code incompatibility.
How could it introduce any incompatibility ?
If people use it, as you hope they will, their code will be
incompatible with old Emacs. This is a recipe for making lots of
work for various people, including some for me.
My decision is to leave this unchanged. There are more important
things for us to do.
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/28
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/27
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/28
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/28
- Re: table.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: table.el, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/26
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/25
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/11/25
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/29
Re: table.el, Alex Schroeder, 2001/11/24