[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1
From: |
Daniel Ortmann |
Subject: |
Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1 |
Date: |
30 Nov 2001 19:49:21 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
address@hidden (Gerd Moellmann) writes:
> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>> One idea is to record the time at which each image was last
>> displayed, and get rid of any image that has not been displayed in 10
>> minutes. I don't know if this is really feasible in the code as it
>> is written. Gerd, what do you think? Any advice?
> Incidentally, what you describe is already implemented and exactly the
> way you proposed: clear_image_cache is called from redisplay,
> indirectly, when it clears the face cache, and clears images that
> haven't been displayed for 30 minutes.
> Maybe it suffices if that time is simply made shorter. Or maybe one
> could implement another idea: record where the image was displayed,
Gerd, I did not "display" _any_ images; I merely process-marked them and
pressed "o" to download them.
1) I suspect that the "display" code is activated in download contexts
where "image-cache-eviction-delay" is not used.
2) Is it possible that display-oriented activity is happening
unnecessarily in "o" download contexts?
In case it matters, my custom-set-variables contains:
'(gnus-default-article-saver (quote gnus-summary-save-in-file))
> and remove images from the cache when the buffer they were displayed
> in is killed (which wouldn't capture the case when a buffer is reused;
> I'm not sure what Gnus does, perhaps someone else knows.).
Apparently clear-image-cache is not being fired when expected.
> Daniel, could you please try with lower values for
> image-cache-eviction-delay, and see if that suffices?
I set it from 1800 to 18 and it did not help.
--
Daniel Ortmann, 2414 30 Av NW, #D, Rochester, MN 55901
address@hidden (h) / 507.288.7732 (h)
address@hidden (w) / 507.529.3887 (w)
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, (continued)
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/11/28
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/29
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Kim F. Storm, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Kim F. Storm, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Gerd Moellmann, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Richard Stallman, 2001/11/30
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1,
Daniel Ortmann <=
- Re: X performance suffers under emacs 21.1.1, Daniel Ortmann, 2001/11/28