[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
|
Date: |
03 Dec 2001 01:09:10 +0900 |
Tak Ota <address@hidden> writes:
> It is a bit pity for me because I like this unique characteristic of
> Lisp. No other language I usually deal with provides this capability.
Don't worry, nothing is being taken away; only a feature is being added
(that seems to be the basic rule for emacs!).
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), (continued)
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/03
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/04
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: table.el, Kai Großjohann, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
Re: table.el, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2001/12/01
Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/01