[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el)
|
From: |
Kai Großjohann |
|
Subject: |
Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 02 Dec 2001 17:55:50 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Note that lexical binding is _optional_ -- a source file has to have a
>> file header that turns it on, like:
>>
>> ;;; ... -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
>>
>
> What happens if you inhibit parsing of local variables, i.e. if
> enable-local-variables is nil ?
If this causes problems, then presumably the `coding' tag has similar
problems, so they need to be fixed anyway.
kai
--
Simplification good! Oversimplification bad! (Larry Wall)
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/01
- Re: table.el, Kai Großjohann, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/02
- Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el),
Kai Großjohann <=
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/02
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/03
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/04
- Re: Lexical bindings (was Re: table.el), Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/02