[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GTK.
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GTK. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 5 Dec 2001 02:48:10 -0700 (MST) |
Annoying, but doable and unclean. I would prefer not to see time spent on
an implementation like that when a native GTK port would not be much more
difficult (20%?).
What is a "native GTK port", and what it would entail?
Which parts of Emacs would have to be changed?
- Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/01
- Re[1]: Emacs and GTK., Eric M. Ludlam, 2001/12/01
- Re: Re[1]: Emacs and GTK., William M. Perry, 2001/12/01
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/02
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Richard Stallman, 2001/12/02
- Re: Emacs and GTK., William M. Perry, 2001/12/02
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: Emacs and GTK., William M. Perry, 2001/12/04
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/04
- Re: Emacs and GTK.,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jason Rumney, 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., William M. Perry, 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Richard Stallman, 2001/12/06
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Jan D., 2001/12/07
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Alex Schroeder, 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., William M. Perry, 2001/12/05
- Re: Emacs and GTK., Richard Stallman, 2001/12/06
Re: Emacs and GTK., Ken Raeburn, 2001/12/02