Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?

[Miles Bader]

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Or why don't we take the full step ahead... and make your lexical-binding
> the standard binding for let (and defun).  To bind a variable dynamically,
> it has to be declared via defvar/defcustom or using a new `dlet' form.

Richard has said that he will never accept this.  The _only_ choice we
have is something completely optional.

-Miles
-- 
Somebody has to do something, and it's just incredibly pathetic that it
has to be us.  -- Jerry Garcia