[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:15:03 -0700 (MST) |
That is an interesting alternative. However there is a slight
difference of 4 from other three, which is that 4 is effective only to
the command execution. When the functions are called
non-interactively the hooks are not executed.
That is true--if the property is on command A, and that is called
non-interactively from B which does not have the property, the
hooks will not think they need to do anything.
However, I think the approach I proposed need not have this problem.
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Robert J. Chassell, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/10
- Re: table.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/09
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/09