[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2001 02:56:57 -0700 (MST) |
The cost of Emacs-Lisp "upgrade" is a one-time cost of 2-3 people doing
the design spec and the rest of us implementing it.
There are many other costs. However, I'm not going to argue about it
now--I've made this decision (years ago, in fact) and I just want to
make sure you know the decision.
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, (continued)
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/10
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Sam Steingold, 2001/12/09
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/09
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/10
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Sam Steingold, 2001/12/10
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/12/11
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Sam Steingold, 2001/12/11
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/12
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/12/11
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Sam Steingold, 2001/12/11
- Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/08
Re: Lexical binding -- do we really need it?, Miles Bader, 2001/12/09