[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ".*utf\\(-?8\\)\\>" versus ".*[._]utf" versus "address@hidden>"
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: ".*utf\\(-?8\\)\\>" versus ".*[._]utf" versus "address@hidden>" |
|
Date: |
Sat, 22 Dec 2001 10:38:25 +0200 |
> From: address@hidden (Paul Eggert)
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 15:48:03 -0800 (PST)
>
> Should this patch be applied to both the development version and to
> the Emacs 21 branch?
I think it should go only to the development trunk. The branch is a
pure bug-fix version; in particular, it doesn't have all the code
Dave committed lately (ucs-tables.el etc.), so it's IMHO dangerous to
turn on the UTF support there by default.