[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging leim
From: |
Per Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: Merging leim |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Dec 2001 15:36:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
"Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: address@hidden (Pavel =?iso-8859-2?q?Jan=EDk?=)
>> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:56:37 +0100
>>
>> From: "Eli Zaretskii" <address@hidden>
>> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 12:22:39 +0200
>>
>> > I did that. The size of the standard tarball is now 27.7MB. (Btw,
>> > does anyone know what is the size of the XEmacs ``sumo'' tarball?)
>>
>> 10469429 xemacs-21.5.3.tar.gz
>> 4401838 xemacs-mule-sumo-2001-04-08.tar.gz
>> 17976463 xemacs-sumo-2001-04-08.tar.gz
>
> Is that with or without Leim? If the latter, I wonder how come they
> are so much smaller (6MB) than we are. They do have ELisp manual
> bundled, I believe, and Calc alone, even if it is not part of sumo,
> cannot explain such a large difference.
You need all three XEmacs packages above to get the equivalent of the
Emacs tarball, the sumo packages does not include XEmacs proper.
So XEmacs is still 5MB larger than Emacs.
Re: Merging leim, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/21
Re: Merging leim, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/21
Re: Merging leim, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/12/21
- Re: Merging leim, Paul Eggert, 2001/12/21
- Re: Merging leim, Pavel Janík, 2001/12/22
- Re: Merging leim, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/23
- Re: Merging leim, Henrik Enberg, 2001/12/24
- Re: Merging leim, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/26
- Re: Merging leim, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/27
Re: Merging leim, Bill Wohler, 2001/12/28
Re: Merging leim, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/29