Re: Mysterious "save abbrevs"?

[Kim F. Storm]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> Perhaps the right thing to do is (1) do save these abbrevs
> in the user's .abbrev_defs if he decides to save, and (2)
> once .abbrev_defs has definitions for c-mode-abbrev-table,
> cc-mode should cease trying to specify any.
> 
> Do people see any problems with that solution?

It will prevent future `standard' additions to c-mode-abbrev-table
to be ignored.  

Another option would be if the standard bindings were in another
variable in cc-mode, e.g. c-mode-abbrev-table-default, which is
selectively (only the non-existing entries) copied to
c-mode-abbrev-table when cc-mode is activated.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk