Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el

[Dave Love]

>>>>> Richard Stallman writes:

 > If latin-ltx  generates the mathematical aleph, beth... and we have
 > this new input method for Unicode aleph, beth..., will that satisfy
 > everyone?  

No.

 > If not, who would find it inconvenient and why?

I wanted, and made, general input methods (independently of the
original latin-ltx).

If people want specifically to input Hebrew in Unicode, they should
just recode the existing method.  Otherwise they could now set
`translation-table-for-input'.  I think Quail could even be made
usefully to choose translations depending on
`buffer-file-coding-system'.  E.g. for input to an 8859-N encoded
buffer, use ucs-8859-N-encode-table.