[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method
From: |
Per Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Feb 2002 17:50:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I think we are having a miscommunication. You argued that it is wrong
> to use custom-save-all for the options menu. I said your argument was
> convincing and I agree. Then you went ahead and rewrote the options
> menu to use custom-save-all.
I argued against customize-save-variable, there isn't any way around
custom-save-all. Despite it name, it doesn't save all, only those
options that have explicitly been marked for saving.
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/14
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/19
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Pavel JanÃk, 2002/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/02/08
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/07
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method,
Per Abrahamsen <=
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/08