[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lost argument and doc string
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: lost argument and doc string |
|
Date: |
Fri, 15 Feb 2002 03:36:33 -0700 (MST) |
What is the reason for proposing these changes?
What problem are you trying to solve?
Is there no simpler solution?
A major change in make-docfile has substantial costs, but it won't
benefit users. So if it isn't necessary, we shouldn't do it.
- Re: lost argument and doc string, (continued)
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/12
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/14
- Re: lost argument and doc string,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/15
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Tak Ota, 2002/02/14
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/13
- Re: lost argument and doc string, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/11