[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS)
|
From: |
Jason Rumney |
|
Subject: |
Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS) |
|
Date: |
24 Feb 2002 12:05:41 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> The DJGPP port of GNU `ls' also reads the files, for the same reasons,
> but someone (perhaps even you) told me that it is much faster.
In my experience, all the Cygwin tools are much slower than native
ports. They have improved since a few years ago though, when Cygwin
diff took about 2 minutes on a 250k file, while a native port took
about 10 seconds.
--
Jason Rumney
- Re: Using GDB in NTEMACS, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>, 2002/02/22
- Re: Using GDB in NTEMACS, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/22
- Re: Using GDB in NTEMACS, Jon Cast, 2002/02/22
- Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/22
- Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS), Jon Cast, 2002/02/22
- Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/23
- Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS), Ehud Karni, 2002/02/24
- Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/24
- Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS),
Jason Rumney <=
- Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS), Jon Cast, 2002/02/26
- Re: Cygwin build (was: Using GDB in NTEMACS), Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/27
- Re: Using GDB in NTEMACS, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/22
- Re: Using GDB in NTEMACS, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/24
- Re: Using GDB in NTEMACS, Jon Cast, 2002/02/24
Re: Using GDB in NTEMACS, Stefan Monnier, 2002/02/22
Re: Using GDB in NTEMACS, Jason Rumney, 2002/02/22