[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on reve
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:11:30 +0200 (IST) |
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Here the user visited the file with Latin-2, then changed the file's
> > encoding on disk into UTF-8, then reverted the buffer. Should Emacs
> > autodetect in this case or not?
>
> I don't think it matters since both options can make sense depending
> on the context.
Yes, that was my point. We've been around these issues more than once,
and the conclusion always was that the current default is no worse than
the other possibilities. So we decided not to change the current
behavior.
> Prompting the user is another option.
Perhaps as an option, and only in interactive invocation of
revert-buffer; otherwise I'm afraid some VC-related commands will become
a nuisance.
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Miles Bader, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/27