[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:23:29 -0700 (MST) |
GNUTLS is a library, OpenSSL is both a library and an application.
William's ssl.el invokes the binary. This is a inflexible method, it
is complicated to find out what algorithms chosed during the TLS
handshake, and generally difficult to do anything interactive during
the TLS handshake.
I see why that method is not as flexible. But it is nonetheless a
useful alternative. If OpenSSL can do it, why can't we do it?
Even if GNUTLS shipped with a binary allowing it to do all the things
OpenSSL currently does, it would not be satisfactory.
Would this method be less satisfactory for GNUTLS than it is for OpenSSL?
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, (continued)
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, William M. Perry, 2002/02/04
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/07
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, William M. Perry, 2002/02/21
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/21
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/22
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/23
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/23
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/24
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/24
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Simon Josefsson, 2002/02/25
- Re: Another update of GNU TLS bindings, Richard Stallman, 2002/02/26