[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on reve
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 22:50:41 -0700 (MST) |
One could argue that, since the original visit was with "C-x RET c",
the user wants to force Emacs to use that coding system.
Maybe yes, maybe no. Since it isn't conclusive what the user wanted,
it is best for revert-buffer to be consistent with its handling of
other issues, and reexamine everything.
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Miles Bader, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/27
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Kenichi Handa, 2002/02/25