[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on reve
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] |
|
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:08:47 -0700 (MST) |
|> I think your change should be made, but revert-file should autodetect
|> when you do not specify a coding system in this way.
In replace mode insert-file-contents uses buffer-file-coding-system when
coding-system-for-read is nil, so no autodection is done.
Yes, I understand. I think should change that.
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], (continued)
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Miles Bader, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/25
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/26
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Richard Stallman, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Andreas Schwab, 2002/02/27
- Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?],
Richard Stallman <=
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/02/27
Re: address@hidden: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?], Kenichi Handa, 2002/02/25