Re: address@hidden: blink-cursor improvement suggestion]

[Tak Ota]

02 Mar 2002 00:27:25 +0100: address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) wrote:

> I have committed changes to both X and w32, but only tested it on X.

There was a small typo, however after this correction the w32 version
seems to run fine.

-Tak


*** w32term.c.orig      Fri Mar  1 16:59:32 2002
--- w32term.c   Sun Mar  3 07:56:55 2002
***************
*** 9787,9793 ****
        && (!on
          || w->phys_cursor.x != x
          || w->phys_cursor.y != y
!         || new_cursor_type != w->phys_cursor_type)
          || (new_cursor_type == BAR_CURSOR
              && new_cursor_width != w->phys_cursor_width)))
      x_erase_phys_cursor (w);
--- 9787,9793 ----
        && (!on
          || w->phys_cursor.x != x
          || w->phys_cursor.y != y
!         || new_cursor_type != w->phys_cursor_type
          || (new_cursor_type == BAR_CURSOR
              && new_cursor_width != w->phys_cursor_width)))
      x_erase_phys_cursor (w);