Re: featurep

[Jason Rumney]

address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> However, for a usage point of view, I don't really see why it
> matters, and IMHO, using featurep will be _less_ intuitive.
> For example, I think using
> 
>   (if (and (make-network-process :feature :family 'local)
>            (make-network-process :feature :datagram t))

Having make-network-process doing something other than making a
network process is not a more intuitive solution than featurep.


-- 
Jason Rumney