[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from
From: |
Francesco Potorti` |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim] |
Date: |
11 Apr 2002 11:48:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.50 |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
With transient-mark-mode off (nil), C-SPC C-SPC temporarily turns on
transient-mark-mode (lambda), and another C-SPC turns it off (and
moves the mark).
Wonderful.
With transient-mark-mode on (t), C-SPC C-SPC sets and deactivates the mark.
I think that's good, too.
As an added bonus, C-u C-SPC C-SPC C-SPC will pop back through the
mark stack, i.e. only the first command needs the C-u prefix.
Not bad at all. Yes, a nice idea.
To set (reactivate) the mark immedately following a series of
C-u C-SPC C-SPC C-SPC C-SPC C-SPC commands, use C-u C-SPC (or
C-u C-SPC C-SPC to toggle transient-mark-mode).
Or even just give any other command, right?
This is a significant deviation from the old behaviour of C-u C-SPC,
but the new functionality is much easier to use...!
Yes, I think so. Only sophisticated users know about C-u C-SPC, so
this problem may not be serious. On the other hand, working with
Emacses of different versions could be annoying. But overall I like
the idea.
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/08
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Benjamin Rutt, 2002/04/08
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/09
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Richard Stallman, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kai Großjohann, 2002/04/10
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/11
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim],
Francesco Potorti` <=
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/11
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/11
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Richard Stallman, 2002/04/11
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/12
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/12
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Richard Stallman, 2002/04/13
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/14
- Re: address@hidden: [patch] factor out comment-or-uncomment feature from comment-dwim], Richard Stallman, 2002/04/16