[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: config.in
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: config.in |
Date: |
17 Apr 2002 21:09:28 +0900 |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> For files like config.in the chances that conflicts happen are rather low,
> unless you change configure.in in the first place. This is quite
> different from loaddefs.el, which also contains local time stamps.
Actually the file I'm really annoyed by is `configure', which has caused
me grief in the past -- the conversation about config.in just reminded
me to complain about it.
-Miles
--
P.S. All information contained in the above letter is false,
for reasons of military security.
- Re: config.in, (continued)
- Re: config.in, Karl Eichwalder, 2002/04/16
- Re: config.in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Miles Bader, 2002/04/16
- Re: config.in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Miles Bader, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/04/17
- Re: config.in,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: config.in, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/18
- Re: config.in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/04/19
- Re: config.in, Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/19
- Re: config.in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/04/19
- Re: config.in, Kim F. Storm, 2002/04/19
- Re: config.in, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/20
- Re: config.in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/04/21
- Re: config.in, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Re: config.in, Andreas Schwab, 2002/04/22
- Re: config.in, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22