[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 10:55:32 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.1.30 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> writes:
>> But Handa-san listed a couple of problems with using the standard syntax
>> tables.
> I seem to have missed his email.
My point is:
show-trailing-whitespace should not mean highlighting such
charactes that have "whitespace" SYNTAX, but should mean
highlighting sucn characters that have "whitespace" GLYPH.
Both sets of characters mostly overlap but not necessarily
be the same.
For instance, even if I set syntax of NBSP to "word
constitute", show-trailing-whitespace should highlight it.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, (continued)
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/14
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/15
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Stefan Monnier, 2002/04/18
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/19
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Ulrich Neumerkel, 2002/04/14
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Kenichi Handa, 2002/04/14
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted,
Kenichi Handa <=
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Kenichi Handa, 2002/04/21