[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reducing defface redundancy
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: reducing defface redundancy |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:35:50 +0300 |
> From: Per Abrahamsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:59:41 +0200
>
> It is really easy to invent all kinds of smart stuff to the defface
> spec at the Lisp level. Comming up with good UI is way harder.
Sorry, I don't understand: what UI? defface is not a user-level
feature, it's a programmer feature. Did you mean API, perhaps?
If you do mean the API, I believe Miles was trying to make it better,
more convenient. The need to repeat the same face attributes over
and over is a PITA, IMHO.
- reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/19
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Per Abrahamsen, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Alex Schroeder, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/20
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Richard Stallman, 2002/04/22
- Re: reducing defface redundancy, Miles Bader, 2002/04/22