[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:37:20 -0600 (MDT) |
In my understanding, the purpose of show-trailing-whitespace
is to tell users that there are characters that has space
glyphs (thus invisible) at end of line. So, yes, if some
characters are displayed by SPCs because of display-table,
it is better that we take that info account (although it may
require a rather big change in the display engine).
I wouldn't do this if it took more than 5 minutes.
It is too obscure a case to be worth more than that much
of any of our time.
>> For instance, even if I set syntax of NBSP to "word
>> constitute",
I really think NBSP should be highlighted also in such a
(hypothetical) situation. What do the other people think?
I agree.
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Ulrich Neumerkel, 2002/04/14
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Kenichi Handa, 2002/04/14
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Kenichi Handa, 2002/04/18
Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted, Kenichi Handa, 2002/04/21
- Re: Latin-1 non breaking space not highlighted,
Richard Stallman <=