[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: init_buffer PWD fix
From: |
宮下 尚:HIMI |
Subject: |
Re: init_buffer PWD fix |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:14:41 +0900 |
User-agent: |
T-gnus/6.15.4 (based on Oort Gnus v0.04) (revision 11) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.1 (i386-msvc-nt5.1.2600) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Meadow/1.99 Alpha1 (AWOFUCHI) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I see no reason to think the situation has changed.
> Our most important platform is GNU, and this optimization
> is useful on GNU, so we will keep it. There's no need to spend
> time arguing about that question.
Excuse me, but I'd like to reconfirm this statement because it's important
not only technically also politically even if my proposal is rejected.
Debian GNU/Linux is important GNU platform, isn't it? Simple getcwd() call
is much (about three times) faster than this optimization at least on Debian
GNU/Linux(sid) as I've proven that.
With regards,
from himi
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 永野圭一郎, 2002/04/22
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/23
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/23
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Paul Eggert, 2002/04/24
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/04/24
Re: init_buffer PWD fix, 宮下 尚:HIMI, 2002/04/24