[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed? |
Date: |
Thu, 23 May 2002 14:16:54 -0700 |
in src/indent.c `current_column', ^N and \NNN are presently hard coded
as taking 2 and 4 columns, respectively. i'd like to propose that these
always be displayed in a fixed-width font, to avoid having to compute
their display widths. this is not a big deal for ^N, but to compute
width of \NNN efficiently could mean another cache.
from user perspective, it seems to me ^N or \NNN as fixed width makes
reading them easier.
thi
- display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Richard Stallman, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/26
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Miles Bader, 2002/05/24
- Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/05/25