[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:33:41 -0600 (MDT) |
it seems that when things get slow, everything gets slow.. it seems to
take emacs a minute to even recognize a C-n ...
How strange. Well, it should be easy to investigate this. Run Emacs
under GDB, and when it gets slow, stop it with C-z a few times and run
`backtrace' and `xbacktrace' each time. After a few times, you will
see where Emacs is spending its time.
- Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, John Wiegley, 2002/06/14
- Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, D. Goel, 2002/06/14
- Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, Richard Stallman, 2002/06/15
- Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, D. Goel, 2002/06/16
- Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, Richard Stallman, 2002/06/17
- Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, D. Goel, 2002/06/18
- Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/06/19
- Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, John Wiegley, 2002/06/19
- Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, D. Goel, 2002/06/19
- Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/06/15
Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?, Richard Stallman, 2002/06/15