[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: abstracting Lisp strings - macro name convention?
|
From: |
Henrik Enberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: abstracting Lisp strings - macro name convention? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 03 Jul 2002 15:17:06 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> STRING_REF(obj,index)
>> STRING_SET(obj,index,newbyteval)
>
> Wouldn't it be more consistent to name these
>
> STRING_AREF(obj,index)
> STRING_ASET(obj,index,newbyteval)
They are called `string-ref' and `string-set!' in scheme. So if this is
done for a future switch to Guile, the the first alternative is probably
better.
--
Booting... /vmemacs.el