[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
04 Jul 2002 07:03:42 +0900 |
Jon Cast <address@hidden> writes:
> > It would perhaps be logical to use negative minor-minor version
> > numbers. I wonder if that would break anything. We could try it.
>
> I think this is a good idea. The only question is what minor/micro
> version number CVS versions should have under this scheme---the minor
> number of the following version and a negative micro number, or the
> minor number of the preceding version and a high micro number. Hmm.
I assumed he meant the former, e.g. 21.4.-2.x would always be a CVS
version and 21.4.-1.y would always be a prelease (or something).
By the latter, I assume you meant e.g. 21.4.0.-x and having -X count `up
towards 0'. The disadvantage of that is you have to pick a very high X
to avoid inadvertantly hitting 0 before you're ready...
-Miles
--
Saa, shall we dance? (from a dance-class advertisement)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jason Rumney, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/03
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/04
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Francesco Potorti`, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/08