[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Jon Cast |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Jul 2002 21:19:47 -0500 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> Maybe the CVS version could be fixed at 21.4.-99 Pretests would
> then use 21.4.-98, 21.4.-97, ... etc. as a count-down towards
> the final release which will be 21.4.0 Any bug fixes for that
> release will be 21.4.1, 21.4.2 etc.
> This might be a good idea. (I would probably start at -10 rather
> than -99.)
I agree. However, IMO the first pretest should be -20 or -30 rather
than -10 --- from what I understand, Emacs 21 went up to pretest 106
from 90, which makes 17 pretests.
I assume CVS would be -50 or some such?
> To avoid confusion, the real release should be .1, not .0.
I'm not sure I follow this. Confusion about what?
Jon Cast
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Jon Cast <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/09
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/09
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/10
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/02