Re: [patch] XPM in gamegrid.el

[Miles Bader]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>     > Do we always want this?  Should the minibuffer use the face definitions
>     > of the main buffer?
> 
> The simplest definition is, the buffer that was current when you
> issued the command.

Hmm, well, see the rest of that same message for reason why I think
that's not a good thing.

>     But I think my Calc examples is somewhat atypical.
> 
> Should that Calc example do something special to copy the face
> definitions from the current buffer?

That would be an acceptable solution, certainly (I already do a bunch of
junk to setup this special calc frame, so it's not a problem to a little
more).

-Miles
-- 
Yo mama's so fat when she gets on an elevator it HAS to go down.