[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No calc in pretest?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: No calc in pretest? |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:43:10 +0300 (IDT) |
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Jon Cast wrote:
> > This might be a good idea. (I would probably start at -10 rather
> > than -99.)
>
> I agree. However, IMO the first pretest should be -20 or -30 rather
> than -10 --- from what I understand, Emacs 21 went up to pretest 106
> from 90, which makes 17 pretests.
I'd suggest -30 or even -40 for major releases. Then you have the
flexibility to bump from -30 to -20 if the number of problems in -30 is
not large.
This corresponds to what was used in the past: major releases started
with a .70 or even .65 minor-minor version.
- Re: No calc in pretest?, (continued)
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/05
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/08
- Re: No calc in pretest?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/09
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Jon Cast, 2002/07/10
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Kai Großjohann, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Eli Zaretskii, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/02
- Re: No calc in pretest?, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/02