Re: Results of C-x C-q poll

[Andre Spiegel]

On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 00:06, Kim F. Storm wrote:

> But what about my suggestion that C-u C-x C-q does just toggle-read-only
> instead of the current behaviour which is also available on C-u C-x v v
> in case it is needed (I rarely - if ever - needed it myself).

I do see some merit in this idea, but now that we've agreed on a
somewhat "minimalist" solution, I hesitate to change the old command as
well.  Some people surely won't like this, and we'll have another
discussion about a possible user option...

If we're resorting to global-set-key here, anyway, then I think a simple
solution for you would be to put vc-toggle-read-only on C-x C-q, and
plain toggle-read-only on C-c q or something that is equally easy to
type.

Thoughts?