[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX |
Date: |
12 Jul 2002 12:16:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:08:58 -0400, "Stefan Monnier"
> <monnier+gnu/address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > But the count -> index|spix|... switch is just plain silly
Changes which can improve the maintainablility of the code are not silly.
You may not want them, and we may decide against them, but that doesn't
make them silly.
It seems that some emacs hackers have a habit of keeping big thunks of
changes locally for a long time... That's fine, but doing so should
not prevent others from maintaining the code in CVS.
>
> Hmm... Not really. There are six or seven different names for the same
> concept through the code. Unifying them would be useful, if only to make
> understanding simpler for newcomers (like me).
Exactly my experience.
>
> But I suppose others will have to decide what to do in that case :)
>
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, (continued)
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Andreas Schwab, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Stefan Monnier, 2002/07/11
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/12
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/12
- Re: BINDING_STACK_SIZE => SPECPDL_INDEX, Juanma Barranquero, 2002/07/12