[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *Occur in buf*?
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: *Occur in buf*? |
Date: |
28 Jul 2002 02:15:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> IWBNI M-x occur created an *Occur in buf* buffer so that I wouldn't have
> to do this, rather than *Occur*.
>
> I think that for most users this would create unnecessary clutter.
> Perhaps it is best if you simply do this as a customization.
Alternatively, always name the buffer *Occur*, but provide a occur-save-buffer
command (bound to `s') which renames the buffer to *Occur: buffer*; then the
user can easily save precious occur buffers on a needed basis.
The same could be done for *Help* buffers where it would sometimes be very
useful to keep multiple help buffer around, e.g. *Help: save-buffer* and
*Help: bury-buffer*.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
Re: *Occur in buf*?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/26
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Benjamin Rutt, 2002/07/26
- Re: *Occur in buf*?,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/27
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Kim F. Storm, 2002/07/29
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Sam Steingold, 2002/07/30
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/30
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Richard Stallman, 2002/07/31
- Re: *Occur in buf*?, Sam Steingold, 2002/07/31
Re: *Occur in buf*?, Miles Bader, 2002/07/28